Standards-Aligned Assessment Drafts
Prepare editable checks tied to the selected course, plan item, standard, and learning goal.
Assessment and Rubrics
Connect Assessment Drafts, Approved Rubrics, Paper Evidence, and Human Decisions
Prepare standards-aligned checks and rubric proposals while keeping evidence review, scoring, mastery, and reteaching decisions with educators.
Why this workflow stays connected
ClassLattice connects assessment and rubric revisions to standards, supports paper and digital evidence review, and keeps scores, mastery, and follow-up actions explicitly educator-owned.
Core capabilities
Approved Rubric Revisions
Build and approve rubric versions that can be pinned to a feedback or evidence-review workflow.
Paper Evidence Review
Capture handwritten or printed work, inspect proposed extraction, and confirm what should become evidence.
Reteach and Parallel Form B
Use reviewed evidence to prepare an editable follow-up or parallel assessment without automatically declaring mastery.
Workflow comparison
| Capability | Disconnected workflow | ClassLattice |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment context | Standalone generated questions | Plan, standard, and source lineage |
| Rubric use | Unversioned scoring prompt | Approved rubric revision |
| Paper work | Manual transcription or opaque score | Visible extraction and teacher confirmation |
| Mastery | May be auto-assigned | Human-confirmed judgment |
Frequently asked questions
Does ClassLattice automatically assign mastery?
No. It can organize evidence and prepare proposals, but an authorized educator records the mastery or instructional decision.
Can I use handwritten work as evidence?
Yes. Paper Evidence supports image capture and proposed extraction with teacher review before the record is confirmed.