Rubric-Revision Grounding
Each feedback batch uses an approved rubric revision and records the response revision that was reviewed.
Writing Feedback
Teacher-Reviewed Formative Writing Feedback with Revision Context
Review rubric-aligned proposals, edit every comment, release feedback, and give learners a clear path back to their response.
Why this workflow stays connected
ClassLattice snapshots the submitted response and rubric revision, proposes criterion-level observations, and keeps edit, reject, release, and revision decisions with the teacher.
Core capabilities
Editable Feedback Proposals
Teachers can revise overall comments, annotations, and criterion observations rather than accepting an opaque automatic grade.
Exact Learner Preview
Preview the released experience before learners see it, including the source excerpt and teacher-approved comments.
Feedback-to-Revision Loop
Released feedback links learners back to the live activity while preserving which response revision the feedback addressed.
Workflow comparison
| Capability | Disconnected workflow | ClassLattice |
|---|---|---|
| Rubric context | May use an unversioned prompt | Approved rubric revision pinned |
| Teacher control | Automatic score or comment | Edit, reject, and release controls |
| Learner view | Feedback separated from the task | Linked return to the response |
| Mastery decision | May be inferred automatically | No automatic grade or mastery judgment |
Frequently asked questions
Does ClassLattice automatically grade student writing?
No. It can prepare rubric-aligned feedback proposals, but the teacher reviews the evidence and controls what is released.
What happens after feedback is released?
The learner can read the approved feedback and return to the live activity to submit a new response revision. The feedback remains tied to the reviewed version.