Formative Margin Feedback
Give specific feedback while preserving authorship.
use-case
Prepare bounded feedback, review each item, preserve the original writing context, and release only the feedback the educator accepts.
The writing feedback workflow preserves the learner response revision, selected rubric, draft feedback, educator edits, release state, and later learner revision as distinct but connected records.
Open a learner response from the intended course and bind the review to its exact saved revision and the approved rubric or criteria.
Create margin or summary feedback grounded in the selected text and criteria without converting assistance into an automatic grade, mastery label, or authorship accusation.
The educator accepts, changes, removes, or sends feedback back through review while Authorship History keeps the development of the work visible.
Publish only the reviewed feedback, retain the learner-visible release state, and connect a later learner revision or instructional follow-up without changing the original response.
These current product capabilities keep their records, permissions, review points, and reusable outputs connected to the experience.
Give specific feedback while preserving authorship.
See how student work developed and where assistance was used.
Run standards-grounded live activities with teacher visibility and reviewed evidence.
View evidence from class through district rollups.
Review class evidence, approve a rationale, and carry the next instructional move into a later day.